Andrew's Wiki
Philosophy History (changes)
Showing changes from revision #3 to #4:
Added | Removed | Changed
Benjamin’s Theses on the Philosophy of History
Composed Paris 1940 (exile), before his own death
Seen as last major text
Aphoristic, koans; parables, metaphors, images
1. Chess Automaton as Hist Mat
- Puppet looks like it plays chess, but really there’s a chess expert hidden, pulling its strings
- It is hist mat because you think there’s some Law running it, but truly it’s about the people behind it.
2. Redemption
- Each present generation has to settle the “claim” the past generation has on it, for the past expects the future to redeem it, and you must take this responsibility seriously.
- Settling the claim will not be “cheap.”
- Says hist mat understands this: knows you owe the past something, a return for its faith in you, save them from their sins.
3. Fullness of the Past
- Redeemed mankind will feel the fullness of the past: “nothing that has ever happened should be regarded as lost for history.”
- All is relevant; nothing is major or minor.
- “Citable in all its moments:” creepy b/c you can’t let anything slip past you, must be responsible, prevent all awful stuff.
4. Secret Heliotropism
- Class struggle should be accompanied by “courage, humor, cunning, fortitude.”
- Doing so will cast retroactive judgment on past, transforming what the past looks like (sounds like Eliot’s tradition!)
- “a secret heliotropism” in which the past stretches towards the future
- in Thesis 6, he says “even the dead will not be safe from the enemy if he wins”
5. Image of the Past
- “The past can be seized only as an image which flashes up at the instant when it can be recognized and is never seen again.”
- “Where historical materialism cuts through historicism:” hist mat’s recognition that the past is one of our own concerns, and that this recognition is what makes it our “true past”
- The past disappears when you don’t see it in terms of your own present
6. Danger
- “to seize hold of a memory as it flashes up at a moment of danger” b/c danger “affects both the content of the tradition and its receivers”
- What’s the threat? To become “tool of the ruling classes,” so you must keep tradition away from conformism
7. Sad Historicists
- They empathizes w/victors, which “benefits the rulers,” letting you forget the trodden below the victors
- “There is no document of civilization which is not at the same time a document of barbarism”
- b/c think of the “anonymous toil” behind it, which you “cannot contemplate without horror”
- so don’t get too comfy loving “spoils:” cultural treasures
- You will be barbarous if you support this mode of telling history. This hist mat folks go “against the grain.”
8. Emergency
- History is a history of “states of emergencies.” We’re always in a cramped state.
- You should create true states of emergencies.
- Blank amazement about Fascism won’t do anything; recognize that it used the state of emergency to gain unfair power.
9. Angel of History
- Klee’s Angelus Novus
- Turned towards past, the angel, “where we perceive a chain of events, he sees one single catastrophe which keeps piling wreckage upon wreckage and hurls it in front of his feet.”
- Angel can’t help anyone: the storm (progress) is “caught in his wings”
- “This storm irresistibly propels him into the future to which his back is turned”
10. High Price
- Compares his Theses to the “monastic discipline” used to focus the friars
- Wants us to see the high prices of a particular view of history: its bland trust in masses and progress: leads to “servile integration” into systems we abhor
11. Technocratic Lies!
- Conformism has paralyzed Social Democracy
- Sidenote: it has accepted dangerous view of labor, one of mastering nature, which is too diff from views of labor within utopian thinkers pre-1848
- Prefers the utopianism of Fourier to the positivism of technocratic folk who see exploitation of nature as better than that of proles
- “Illusion that the factory work which was supposed to tend toward technological progress constituted a political achievement:”
- The wrong view of industry (in this case, a secularized Protestant work ethic) can create political tragedy
- Technocratic is bad b/c forgets the social organiz behind it: can’t accept tech progress at all costs (“recognizes only the progress in the mastery of nature, not the retrogression of society”)
12. Past, not Future
- Working class is “depository of historical knowledge”
- Thus, avenges past: “task of liberation in the name of the generations of the downtrodden”
- Social Democrats have wrongly made them think about the future: “redeemer of future generations”
- But the hatred and sacrifice necessary for success is “nourished by the image of the enslaved ancestors, rather than of the liberated grandchildren”
13. Progress
- Even Social Democrats have believe that human progress 1) happens, 2) is boundless, and 3) is inevitable/automatic.
- All of those things are wrong
- Need to revise our understanding of time to fix it: shouldn’t see time as “homogeneous, empty time”
14. Fashion of History
- Instead of homogeneous, empty time, you have “time filled by the presence of now”
- “Fashion has a flair for the topical, no matter where it stirs in the thickets of long ago.”
- Robespierre channeling Rome is symptomatic: you can leap in time; that’s dialectical: “leap in the open air of history”
15. Revolutionary Time
- “about to make the continuum of history implode:” that’s revolutionary awareness
- “moments of historical consciousness” might not happen for awhile, but they’re ready to erupt at any time (cf July revolution)
16. The Present, in the mind of an Historical Materialist
- It’s a full stop: not a transition
- A position from which you write history
- “supplies a unique experience with the past”
- Unique rather than historicism’s “eternal”
17. Blasting Out of the Lifework
- Historicism
- Additive, not theoretical
- Mass data
- Materialism
- Constructive principle: thinking stops in “configuration pregnant with tensions” and “crystallizes into a monad”
- Why crystalized monad?
- “Messianic cessation of happening” where you can intervene
- You “blast out a specific era out of the homogeneous course of history”
- To subject it to Hegel’s aufheben: cancel/preserve/elevate (dialectical)
18. Length of Human History
- The biologist’s timeline wherein the entire span of human development lasts a fraction of a second in the day of universal time
- Compares this to Messianic present: b/c the Messianic present “comprises the entire history of mankind in an enormous abridgement”
A. Causality v Constellation
- Remarks on historicists attributing causality: remarks that in this case what happens previously acts “posthumously:” this is the key to good history
- Instead, see “the constellation whcih is own era has formed with a definite earlier one”
B. Remembrance
- Soothsaying and remembrance as negations of idea of time as empty and homogeneous
- Can’t have homogeneous time when at any moment Jesus might return
Historicism
- What is historicism?
- Dominant mode of history at the time
- Pure context: to understand some text, you must understand its historical context
- What’s Benj upset about?
- Historicism regards time as homogeneous and empty
- It believes in progress, in closure
- Empathizes with victors
- It believes understanding past in terms of present is anachronistic
- “Melancholy desire to ‘relive an era’” cf Peter Buse, Drama and Theory, 114
- Problem: makes you think you can access historical moment as a whole, in its entirety, and that it’s safely cordoned off from the present
- Benj wants to understand past in terms of present
Revised on November 14, 2008 14:03:09
by
shawna?
(71.58.78.59)