Andrew's Wiki
Of Other Spaces (changes)
Showing changes from revision #1 to #2:
Added | Removed | Changed
Intro
- 19th c obsession: history
- “The great obsession of the nineteenth century was, as we know, history: with its themes of development and of suspension, of crisis, and cycle, themes of the ever-accumulating past, with its great preponderance of dead men and the menacing glaciation of the world.”
- Whereas 20th c, “epoch of space:” dispersed, juxtaposed, near and far
- “less that of a long life developing through time than that of a network that connects points and intersects with its own skein.”
- structuralism a part of this trend
- Yet history HAS had conceptions of space (space not “invented” by 20th c)
- Middle Ages: “hierarchic ensemble of places: sacred places and profane plates: protected places and open, exposed places: urban places and rural places”
- Sacred places: celestrial v territorial space
- Thus, Middle Ages is about “emplacement,” where things are kicked out of certain spaces and settled into others, in complete hierarchy
- In other words, localization
- Next: Galileo: “his constitution of an infinite, and infinitely open space.”
- Things aren’t still, but always moving. Even stability is just a slow movement.
- In other words, extension
- Next: The Site
- It’s where we are, trees, sets, grids, where sites are determined by “relations of proximity between points or elements”
- Coded elements can be organized or random
- Modern times: place is made from a relation among sites
- It’s a problem to be worked out: “what type of storage, circulation, marking, and classification of human elements should be adopted in a given situation in order to achieve a given end. ”
- Notice it’s about optimization
- Hence, he says, our feeling of “anxiety”
- More on Modern Spaces
- We have knowledge and ways to code it, but still space isn’t completely “desanctified,” that is not practically desanctified even though Galileo began this tendency
- We’re still guided by “oppositions:” private v public space, family v social space, leisure v work space, useful v cultural space
- (He also in passing refers to temporary relaxation sites: cafes, beaches, cinema)
- These differences hint at the SACRED still around
- Bachelard and phenomenology = space isn’t homogenized but phantasmic
- “we do not live in a kind of void, inside of which we could place individuals and things”
- “we live inside a set of relations that delineates sites which are irreducible to one another and absolutely not superimposable on one another.”
- Space is where “erosion” of ourselves happens, history happens, “the space that claws and gnaws at us”
- Two Strange Spaces: Heterotopias and Utopias
- Both “have the curious property of being in relation with all the other sites, but in such a way as to suspect, neutralize, or invent the set of relations that they happen to designate, mirror, or reflect.”
- Utopias
- Unreal
- Show society “perfected or turned upside down,” “direct or inverted analogy” with existing society
- Heterotopias
- Real
- Formed when those societies themselves form
- Outside of all places
- “counter-sites, a kind of effectively enacted utopia in which the real sites, all the other real sites that can be found within the culture, are simultaneously represented, contested, and inverted”
- Completely diff from other sides: thus, hetero
- Mirror is like a heterotopia b/c “it makes this place that I occupy at the moment when I look at myself in the glass at once absolutely real, connected with all the space that surrounds it, and absolutely unreal, since in order to be perceived it has to pass through this virtual point which is over there.”
- Looking at the mirror is like the experience of a heterotopia. Your gaze goes outward to the unreal space in order that you come back to the REAL space knowing what you look like. It gives you your reality therefore: you “come back” to yourself by using the mirror. However, also unreal b/c you needed this weird counterspace to prove it to you.
- Suggests a study that “reads” these places, a heterotopology. You would analyze and describe them.
- “As a sort of simultaneously mythic and real contestation of the space in which we live:” that is what the STUDY of heterotopias would yield (so could a book be a heterotopology? rather than merely feature heterotopias?
Qualities Principles of Heterotopias
- 1) Every society has them, but they may look differently in diff societies
- Primitive societies has crisis heterotopias, for people in crisis (adolescents, pregnant women, elderly)
- We still have a few of ‘em (boarding school, honeymoon, military service)
- But now, mostly we have “heterotopias of deviation:” rest homes, prisons, psychiatric hospitals
- For people whose behavior is deviant
- 2) A heterotopia can be made to serve a different purpose as time goes on
- Cemetery: before, in middle of town, and you may not have your own specific grave; now, b/c of atheism, everyone MUST have own grave, own box
- 3) Can juxtapose many diff, incompatible sites
- “capable of juxtaposing in a single real place several spaces, several sites that are in themselves incompatible.”
- like cinema, theatre, garden (old time gardens are microcosm of plant life, and gardens are happy utopias, a small totality of the world, and its mobile version is a carpet)
- 4) Heterochrony
- “most often linked to slices in time”
- “absolute break with their traditional time”
- museums, libraries: time builds up, “a place of all time” where time’s ravages disappear
- this need to organize information to save things from ravages of time, a “place of all time” in “immobile place” is an idea only in Modernity
- Shows you that heterotopias now are “structured and distributed in a relatively complex fashion”
- Also the festival, which celebrates time’s transitoriness: fairgrounds
- A very interesting example that I should pick up on: “Quite recently, a new kind of temporal heterotopia has been invented: vacation villages, such as those Polynesian villages that offer a compact three weeks of primitive and eternal nudity to the inhabitants of the cities. ”
- “the huts of Djerba are in a sense relatives of libraries and museums, for the rediscovery of Polynesian life abolishes time; yet the experience is just as much the rediscovery of time, it is as if the entire history of humanity reaching back to its origin were accessible in a sort of immediate knowledge.”
- 5) Entrance and exits carefully guarded (in a sense)
- “both isolates them and makes them penetrable”
- To enter: compulsory; accompanied by rites to get in or gestures; gain permission
- Another great example that’s important to me, that shows how much he needs leisure space to get his point made: “there are even heterotopias that are entirely consecrated to these activities of purification -purification that is partly religious and partly hygienic, such as the hammin of the Moslems, or else purification that appears to be purely hygienic, as in Scandinavian saunas.”
- The ones that don’t seem to guard entrance and exits usually have a “curious” system underneath, with “curious exclusions”
- ex: South American homes w/the rooms for uninvited travelers who needed a rest but NEVER got to the main house, which resonates with “famous American motel rooms where a man goes with his car and his mistress and where illicit sex is both absolutely sheltered and absolutely hidden”
- 6) Relation to rest of spaces
- “they have a function in relation to all the space that remains.”
- One of two functions
- “to create a space of illusion that exposes every real space…as still more illusory” OR
- “their role is to create a space that is other, another real space, as perfect, as meticulous, as well arranged as ours is messy, ill constructed, and jumbled”
- compensation
- suggests that “some colonies” might have been these heterotopias, like American Puritan settlements, Jesuit settlements in S America (perfectly regulated, w/cross shaped town and bells to regulate time), “absolutely perfect other places.”
Final Remarks
- Extreme heterotopias: colonies, brothels
- Boat!
- “the boat is a floating piece of space, a place without a place, that exists by itself, that is closed in on itself and at the same time is given over to the infinity of the sea and that, from port to port, from tack to tack, from brothel to brothel, it goes as far as the colonies in search of the most precious treasures they conceal in their gardens, you will understand why the boat has not only been for our civilization, from the sixteenth century until the present, the great instrument of economic development (I have not been speaking of that today), but has been simultaneously the greatest reserve of the imagination. The ship is the heterotopia par excellence. In civilizations without boats, dreams dry up, espionage takes the place of adventure, and the police take the place of pirates. “
Random
- On Leisure: “since in our society where leisure is the rule, idleness is a sort of deviation.”
Revised on December 2, 2008 18:13:02
by
shawna?
(71.58.78.59)