Andrew's Wiki
Pickwick Papers

Dickens’ first novel, 1837, it shows the evolution of a journalist writing vignettes into a social activist/novelist: the end of the jolly picaresque, beginning of homilitic lit

Folks

  • Mr. Pickwick, a jolly old man who’s completely innocent—and whose innocence leads to awful rows and muddles. He is depthless and our Everyman.
  • Sam Weller, truly the most interesting character, with tons of wit and resourcefulness
  • Snodgrass, the poet
  • Tupman, the great romantic
  • Jingle, the swindler who keeps showing up to scam them out of money, seduce the female servants, etc. His telegraphic speech: “as quick as I can – crowds of people – full room – hard work – very” (209) takes out verbs from the English language, ruins syntax, shows the very minimum of communication. It breaks language up into nouns with adjectives: very capitalist because it turns language itself into a series of discrete objects, instead of seeing language as a system. Efficient and imagistic. (“Sarcophagus – fine place – old legends”). Turns people and places into series of objects, a collection: very positivist. He’s the capitalist who sees everything as an object, puts them into relation as objects (equalizing dash)

Themes

  • Amorphous Middle Class
    • Mr. Pickwick and his friends are not nobility, not lower class, but instead from the growing middle class
    • They can go absolutely everywhere, almost going up to the highest classes (ie, the election) and almost to the lowest (debtor’s prison)
    • Middle class seen as undefined, amorphous
    • Shows middle class’ significance as the interpretant, the go-between, of British society
  • Bath
    • The modern pastoral
  • The Club
    • Begins as a scientific enterprise, but then degenerates into fun traveling
  • Violence
    • Dickens “pulls up” when the scenes start to suggest violence
  • Eating and Drinking
    • Associated with revelry
    • Related to archetypal origin of art: festivals
    • Emphasis on the cyclical: eat to stay alive
      • Comedies are about replication and continuation
  • Comedy
    • No consequences: they always seem to come out of scrapes just fine
    • Comedy always approaches violence,, the grotesque
  • Interiority v Weight
    • Pickwick is large, so is the book
    • But he has no interior, no depth or complexity
      • He is a kind of jolly Everyman, not specific, but could be our Neighbor
    • We learn quantitatively a lot, but not qualitatively
      • We don’t know his background or his thoughts
      • We don’t know enough about his finances or his source of wealth
      • We only know what happens to him
    • He’s a summation of events: an episodic surface
      • He’s a reaction, not a real creation
  • Prison
    • Remarkably permeable: people, money, goods flow freely back and forth (servants, friends, family, prisoners, merchants)
      • Another micro-economy, like gambling in Mirth, for capitalism is inside these walls, not just outside it
      • No wonder, either, for they’re in jail because of debt!
    • About community, not isolation
  • City to Suburbs
    • He ends up moving to suburbs to get outside the hubbub

Style

  • As a transition text from 18th century picaresque novels (Fielding, Sterne) into Victorian novels
    • 18th c: truth claim; episodic form; outrageous, fun, out-of-the-ordinary events to real-ish seeming folks
      • Episodes: going to wedding, to election, to the country, a trial; trip to Bath; with lots of embedded narratives (people telling stories completely unrelated to the “story” itself, called “intercollated tales”)
      • At this time, “novel” not codified enough for this not to count as a novel: everything counts now
      • Historical Note: Dickens didn’t actually start out as a novelist: started as sketches to give a view of London
    • Victorian: leads into a real story with a moral
    • Preface:
      • “constant succession of characters and incidents; to paint them in as vivid colours as he could command; and to render them, at the same time, life-like and amusing.”
      • Says that plenty of the best English works only give you a bunch of events, without much more to offer, so he won’t be slow to admit that’s what his work is: “they claim to be nothing else”
        • Values: verisimilitude, entertainment, novelty
      • Says that he wanted each of the twenty “numbers” to be “complete in itself,” yet the whole thing “should form one tolerably harmonious whole, each leading to the other by a gentle and not unnatural process.” (60
        • Values: Progress and episodes
    • After all, writing of Pickwick’s end overlapped with writing Oliver’s beginning, so Oliver affected Pickwick
  • The first serialized novel
  • Episodic form, yet corrupted by the end: it turns into this moral tract about prison
    • You can see the happy-go-lucky text morph into something completely different
    • Far from having unrelated anecdotes, each of which is self-contained and hilarious, you start to have a consistent story that progresses and has a lesson to teach
  • Intercalated tales
    • Everyone has a tale to tell: democratizing
    • Sensational, exciting: no real morals at all here
    • Later books will juxtapose tales that resonate on levels of theme and morals, but not here
    • They stop when Pickwick himself goes to jail: the ghastly becomes a real part of life, so no reason to import it in by adding a tale about it